Greetings and salutations folkses.
I have recently joined a haggis group and having had a quick run through some of the posts. I am very much afraid not much of it fills me with cheer. Firstly.. And as I have come to expect I see no mention, or evidence, of the ancient Haggis. Those that are of the genus "Haggis Scottii", or to simplify, Haggis with a capital "H". Those proud ancestors of the same family groups over one hundred and eighty years of blatant commercialism have forced upon us. It saddens me greatly to see what haggis have become. Their forebears would be justifiably horrified.
Looking, with an experienced eye, at the examples pictured here. I am afraid to say there is a distinct possibility many of todays "haggis" are not even Scottish. And I don't know how many times I have had to remind folks of the fact that tribbles are actually descended from lemmings. Specifically an isolated genetic aggregation. An offshoot of a branch, or spur, of a clan of bog lemmings found around the Gulf of Bothnia in the northern regions of the Baltic Sea. It is also true many lemming species demonstrate similar physical resemblances to some modern day haggis, as well as their antecedents. Most markedly, the blunt nose and the head merging with the body as one, so wrongly identifying them as haggis types is a common mistake. Especially if viewed from the front. But like the mass suicide of the lemmings invented by Disney. More than one supposed truth has had to be corrected over the years.
Admittedly, in the first half of the 19th century, no-one could have fortold what would become of the Haggis. As is widely known they are of unquestioningly Scottish origin, even nowadays their Scottishness has never been truly disputed. But selective breeding with other similar species, environmental control and gene manipulation, have been introduced in more than one country. These processes are/were developed to give the haggis cute little idiosyncratic tendendencies, together with a more appealing appearance. Unfortunately these somewhat radical changes to the gene pool have turned adventurous into adorable, courageous, into cute, inquisitiveness into innocence, empathy into apathy and so on. Another side effect of those practices have led to the haggis no longer having a common language. What is left is merely a series of squeaks and purrs that mean very little to either the haggis, or us. But they sound adorable and nowadays, this is what we have come to expect of them.
There appear to be recently acquired biologically determined characteristics in most modern haggis. But it is reasonable to assume specii do remain whose genes are more closely related to the original strain. And as a result they display more of the traits of their ancestors. Albeit with a sprinkling of some of the attributes mentioned above. But very many hybrid haggis hail from other nations. Primarily Celtic and Scandinavian countries. This is evident in many of your pictures. Proving beyond a doubt that the evolution of the modified species has come about not quite naturally. The anatomical changes alone would have taken much longer to evolve than the one hundred and eighty years or so since the last true Haggis roamed freely the five regions of Scotland they called home. A case in point being the broody haggis mentioned in one post. These particular creatures are actually demonstrating an inherited characteristic of what are broadly considered to be a Welsh spur from the lower reaches of Yr Wyddfa (Mt. Snowdon). It may also be prudent to mention Haggis aren't mammals. The wee beasties originating from Wales are. Might I also point out, female Haggis only ever had one offspring in their somewhat lengthy life cycle.
Contd. after the pic.
Burabhal, North Uist, home to a small isolated Barr (clan) of ancient Haggis in the Western Isles.
Please note:- I am not trying to be confrontational or disrepectful to your good selves. You have been brought up to believe haggis are what they are. The process of cutifying started long before any of you were born. In actual fact it became common practice during the early days of Queen Victoria's reign. Back then it was considered de rigueur for gentlemen of a certain class to visit the Highlands and Lowlands of Scotland for shooting parties. An unavoidable side-effect of these get togethers was that Haggis and humans came to occupy the same territory on a much more regular basis. Previously it was only shepherds and hillsmen who knew of the Haggis and they considered it only right to let them be. Haggis were held to be shy of man, but they did have an inquisitive streak that sometimes brought both species into direct contact. There is even a tale, related to me, of one particular Haggis from the Scottish Lowlands whose inquisitiveness brought him into contact with one of these entitled visitors only fifty or sixty years ago. This particular interaction resulted in tragedy for the poor beastie and ostracism from polite society for the "gentleman". Unfortunately it is not given to me to narrate that particular story, being as it got lost in a crashed computer.
Anyway. I digress... As a result of these sporting gentlemen's new found predeliction for wandering Scottish moors and hillsides taking potshots at anything that moved. It was inevitible the two species were going to come together. I am of the strongly held belief it is very likely many Haggis fell before the guns. A sad happenstance indeed, as this onslaught was the primary reason Haggis took to hiding from mankind once and for all. By the time the sporting types got round all of the Haggis habitats. They were gone. Never to be seen again except by those shepherds and hill folks who knew of their ways and did not wish them any harm. Neither does it help that Scotland's moors still echo to the bark of the shotgun today. But to get back to the point of this particular paragraph the meeting of man and Haggis was inescapable. And not every Haggis fell victim to the Wesley Richards and Holland and Hollands of the day. Some were captured using nets and snares to be relocated to the homes of the shooters. Ostensibly as pets for Victorian children. By all accounts Haggis did not make good pets and they weren't particularly cute. Not every small furry/hairy creature is. Moreover it is beyond any doubt not being appealing didn't concern the Haggis in any way. And so the changing started....
I am not going to offend any of your sensibilities by going into any of the detail, but the final outcome is what we see today. Apparently healthy examples of multiple, biological derivations, of the original species.... This is not necessarily a bad thing as they appear to be hale and hearty and not withstanding, they keep the towrists happy. So who am I to judge?
To finish... Are the ancient Haggis still with us? Yes.
Are we likely to see one? If you're very, very, very lucky, but probably not.
Lastly and most importantly. Do they still dwell in Scotland? Very much so.
Copyright:- L A Maclennan, Professor Emeritus in Haggis Mythology & Leg-end, University of Droontandrookit, Inverness, Scotland.....1998-2024
The forest surrounding Rogie Falls in the Highlands. Haggis would have found this an ideal habitat in the past and perhaps still do.
On Furry Shooglies
A rabbit/shooglie warren on North Uist. The Oystercatcher serves as a lookout.
I have to apologise to all you folks. I haven't told you why shooglies are named as such. Firstly they're only called shooglies in Scotland. Better known as Ravistaa in Scandinavia. When they walk/run a ripple moves from left to right down the length of their bodies. This ripple effect only affects the upper two thirds of their torsos and makes them look like they're shaking from side to side slightly when on the move. Hence Shooglies (from the Scottish verb "to shoogle".
There you go...
Create Your Own Website With Webador